How to use this resource: A collection of past assessment tests, provided for personal practice. For personalised support, Get Matched →
Assignment Brief
This assessment requires you to complete two reflective portfolio templates (Part 1 and Part 2) as evidence of how you have applied the A-EQUIP model while undertaking Restorative Clinical Supervision (RCS) in your role as a Professional Advocate (PA) or Professional Nurse Advocate (PNA).
Each reflection should be completed using the prescribed template provided by your university or module team. Together, the two reflections contribute to the overall assessment for this module.
Part 1 Assignment
Identify a Professional Advocate (PA) restorative clinical supervision session that you have either undertaken or observed. Reflect on the communication styles used, together with the ethical, professional and/or personal issues that were identified and managed during the session.
The restorative clinical supervision session may be:
-
An individual session
-
A peer session
-
A group Restorative Clinical Supervision (RCS) session
Word count: 1,250 words
Module Learning Outcomes
When completing your reflection, demonstrate your ability to:
-
Critically appraise the role of the Professional Advocate in creating an environment that supports cultural change.
-
Demonstrate and apply advanced communication methods that promote the quality of the restorative clinical supervision process while considering ethical, legal, professional and personal issues.
-
Critically explore, synthesise and apply the A-EQUIP model to demonstrate enhanced leadership skills in professional advocacy.
Portfolio Structure
Description (Approximately 200 words)
Provide a concise summary of the scenario, including what happened and what is being examined.
Where appropriate, support your description with relevant literature, policies or research.
Interpretation (Approximately 850 words)
Discuss what was significant, useful or relevant about the experience.
Your discussion should demonstrate critical analysis and be supported by appropriate theory, current literature and research evidence.
Outcome (Approximately 200 words)
Reflect on what you learned from the experience and explain how it will influence your future professional practice.
Summarise your analysis and critical evaluation, supporting your discussion with relevant literature, policy or research where appropriate.
Referencing
Use Harvard Referencing (Cite Them Right) throughout your work.
Part 2 Assignment
Identify and propose a quality improvement initiative that emerged from one of your Professional Advocate restorative clinical supervision sessions or through your work supporting teams in your Professional Advocate role.
Reflect on how compassionate and resilient leadership was used to support quality improvement or service development.
Word count: 1,250 words
Module Learning Outcomes
When completing your reflection, demonstrate your ability to:
-
Critically explore, synthesise and apply the A-EQUIP model to utilise enhanced leadership skills in professional advocacy.
-
Demonstrate and critically reflect on how professional advocacy skills promote safe decision-making while enhancing health, wellbeing and compassionate leadership.
Portfolio Structure
Description (Approximately 200 words)
Provide a concise summary of the quality improvement scenario, including what happened and what is being examined.
Support your discussion with appropriate literature, policy or research where relevant.
Interpretation (Approximately 850 words)
Discuss the key issues arising from the experience, explaining what was significant and why.
Support your reflection with appropriate theory, current literature and research evidence.
Outcome (Approximately 200 words)
Explain what you learned from the experience and how it will influence your future practice.
Summarise your critical evaluation and support your discussion with relevant literature, policy or research where appropriate.
Referencing
Use Harvard Referencing (Cite Them Right) throughout your work.
Need Help with This Assignment?
Understanding the assignment brief is only the first step. Developing a strong reflection, critically analysing the evidence, applying the A-EQUIP model correctly and meeting your university's marking criteria can be much more challenging.
At UKNurses, our experienced nurse academics provide one-to-one support for reflective portfolios, nursing assignments, dissertations and evidence-based practice projects. We can help you interpret the assignment brief, strengthen your critical analysis, improve your academic writing, apply appropriate reflective frameworks and reference correctly using Harvard (Cite Them Right), while ensuring all work remains your own.
Book your free consultation today and receive personalised academic support from an experienced nursing tutor.
Disclaimer: This page reproduces the assignment brief for educational reference only. Assignment requirements may vary between universities and cohorts. Always follow the guidance provided by your module leader or institution. UKNurses does not provide completed assignments. We offer ethical academic support to help nursing students understand assignment requirements and develop their own work.
